Minutes:
The Strategic Lead Transport
Development introduced the report and stated that there were no
fundamental changes to the Priorities List, and was on the agenda
for the Task Force to note. He stated that HE were currently
analysing 26,000 consultation responses, and that because of this
the Council were unlikely to hear from HE until later on in June. He elaborated that HE
were currently looking at the scheme design, but the Council had
not received detail on this. The Strategic Lead Transport
Development then added that HE had provided the data sharing
agreement and cordoned model, and these had been separated into two
sections. The first section related to 2036-2041 and had been sent
over on 13 May 2019; and the second section related to 2031-2051
and had been sent over on 6 June 2019, and the Council’s
consultants, PBA, were currently analysing the data. He moved onto
discussing the Health Impact Assessment (HIA), which was being
progressed and officers had now agreed to its scope. The Strategic
Lead Transport Development finished by stating that the Council
were expecting an announcement from HE in the next few weeks, which
would allow for matters to be progressed further.
The Chair asked if the LTC Task Force would be able to take part in
a traffic modelling workshop, as this had been mentioned in a
previous meeting. The Strategic Lead Transport Development replied
that this could now be progressed and a suitable date could be
identified. He clarified that PBA would need to analyse the data
first, but at the July meeting of the LTC Task Force, a discussion
could take place regarding a date for the workshop.
The Vice-Chair asked if officers were waiting on any information
from HE that they had requested and not
yet received. The Strategic Lead Transport Development replied that
they had been waiting for the cordoned model, but there had been a
legal delay in signing the data sharing agreement. He commented
that the Council had no other data issues and were content with the
information HE had made available, although it had been
delayed.
The Chair questioned the HIA, as this would feature heavily in the
design. He asked when the Task Force would be able to see this
document. The Strategic Lead Transport Development replied that an
item would be coming to the July Task Force when Members could talk
about it with officers from the Public Health team.
The TCAG Representative provided an update from the Thames Crossing
Action Group (TCAG) as HE had been in communication and stated they
were starting pumping works north and south of the river which would run until late August. The TCAG
Representative also stated that HE had announced they would be
boring 700 holes in 400 locations north and south of the river, and
had invited the TCAG to view the works.
The Chair then drew Members attention to page 18 of the agenda and
asked how the project would be funded. The TCAG Representative
replied that she believed that HE would be funding the project
entirely through public money, which had not been allocated yet.
The Chair mentioned that the deadline for central government
funding was October 2019, and this would not be open again for
another 5 years. He felt that if HE could not meet this deadline,
then the scheme could not go ahead as planned. The TCAG
Representative commented that the A303 at Stonehenge were in the
same process, but were at examination phase, and could prove to be
a good comparator. The TCAG Representative asked if the cordoned
model only provided traffic modelling for the proposed route C3.
The Strategic Lead Transport Development replied that it provided a
baseline for the current proposal of LTC.
The Chair asked the Thurrock Business Representative if the Port of
Tilbury had received any response from HE regarding their consultation submission, or any
news on the proposed Tilbury Link Road. The Thurrock Business
Representative replied that although the Port of Tilbury had spoken
with HE, they had been provided with no
clear answers.
The Chair commented that it was important to mitigate against the
scheme and protect urban areas. The TCAG Representative stated that
during the construction of HS2, many trees along the route had
started to die and needed replacing. She commented that she did not
want this to occur during construction of the LTC, and the route
needed proper screening. The Chair also asked what arrangements
were being made to protect Coalhouse Fort. The Strategic Lead
Transport Development replied that he would email a response to
Task Force Members.
The Vice-Chair drew the Task Force’s attention to page 34 of
the agenda, and the section relating to engagement with
stakeholders. He asked if the Council were joining forces with
other major stakeholders, such as the Port of Tilbury, to formalise
their complaints and experiences dealing with HE. The TCAG
Representative added that this was an important suggestion as other
stakeholders were experiencing issues with other projects, as well
as LTC.
Supporting documents: