Minutes:
The Corporate Director Adults
Housing and Health introduced the report and stated that this was a
progress report on a piece of work that had come before the
committee twelve months ago. He outlined the progress that had been
made, as detailed at point 2.3 of the report, and used the examples
of finding £200,000 in the HRA budget for urgent repairs;
undertaking an initial condition survey; liaising with the
Community Payback Team; reviewing tenancy agreements; and filing
up-to-date records and registers. He stated that due to the poor
condition of some garages, some may have to be demolished and
pulled down, but that the garages project team was meeting later on
in the week to discuss these types of issues. He discussed the fact
that a small amount of funding had been found in the HRA budget,
and once this had been agreed by Cabinet, urgent remedial works
could begin. He summarised by stating his team’s commitment
to improving the condition of garages in the borough.
Councillor Redsell opened the debate by commenting that many of the
borough’s garages were reaching the end of their life, and it
was important to find out who owned them. The Corporate Director
replied that records had not been in a good enough state, and
described how Thurrock were going to undertake a full record and
audit to be able to identify the owners of garages. The Assistant
Director Housing added that she would be leading the garages
project team to ensure targets were met and it remained focussed on
issues.
Councillor Pothecary stated that she was pleased to see that
progress had been made, and added that when garages fell into
disrepair it often led to an increase in anti-social behaviour,
which caused concern for all councillors. She asked if the urgent,
remedial work on the garages would always rely on a subsidy from
the HRA, or if in future the maintenance of garages could be
self-sustaining. The Corporate Director clarified that work on
garages was a part of the HRA, which contained a small repair
budget. He added that extra money had been found from within the
HRA to fund the repair of garages, but this could not come from the
capital receipts budget. He also commented that although the
council received income from garages, there was a high void level
and demand across the borough varied significantly.
The Housing Tenant Representative continued the debate and
mentioned the fact that some garages were unsuitable for large
cars. She then asked if applications for garages were renewed every
year. The Assistant Director Housing responded that it was
understood that people rarely used their garages for cars anymore,
and used them as extra storage space instead. She commented that
the council were going to review tenancy agreements with the legal
team, as the change of use could affect issues such as insurance.
She clarified that when a resident applied for a garage, they
remain on the waiting list.
Councillor Redsell added that she felt the council should focus on
finding out the ownership of garages, and upgrading them as many
were now too small because they had been built in the 1970s.
Councillor Liddiard mentioned that as last the review had been
2009, another review should take place to decide whether to repair
or demolish garages. The Corporate Director highlighted the
timescales of the project to the committee and stated that the
recommendations may not be implemented very soon, as housekeeping
work had to be undertaken before the project could begin, such as
structural surveys and record collecting. Councillor Redsell added
that she had received feedback from residents which stated the
appearance of the garages was in a poor state and asked if the
youth offending teams could paint the garage doors. She also asked
if the table included in the report could be broken down to
differentiate between privately owned garages and housing stock.
The Corporate Director replied that another report on this subject
would come back to committee at the end of the calendar year, but
the project would be actioned before the report comes back to
committee. The Assistant Director Housing clarified that the
Community Payback Team could not start work on the garages until
the summer months, due to the weather.
RESOLVED: That:
1. The Committee commented on the information in this report and
the next steps described.
Supporting documents: