Minutes:
Councillor Coxshall introduced
the report and stated that it outlined the next tranche of the 3Rs
policy of release, reuse or retain. He felt that the Council should
not own any assets that were not needed to deliver good services,
and where possible assets not needed by the Council should be
returned to the open market. He stated that in 2019 all Councillors
had signed up to the policy of fewer buildings, better services,
and this report worked to implement this policy. He explained that
this report proposed that some assets were released as part of the
community asset transfer scheme, and would ensure that community
buildings were operated for long-term future needs. He added that
numerous village halls had already requested the freehold for the
building, and this report would allow this to happen, and in some
instances would be given for free. He added that once the asset had
been disposed of to village halls and scout groups, these groups
would be able to access grants that they currently could not, and
would free up their time by removing the necessity for lease
renewals.
Councillor Hebb thanked Councillor Coxshall for his report and felt
that community groups could operate these sites better than the
Council, as they had more experience. He felt that the Council
should not own buildings such as pubs, and the report was
well-timed. He added that he had attended the Corporate Overview
and Scrutiny Committee where the report had been discussed and had
felt pleased to hear from a representative of the Scout Association
in Thurrock that they supported the Council’s disposal of the
scout hut sites, as it would remove current conflicts of interest
and would allow them to access more grants. Councillor Hebb also
felt pleased to see the Stanford-le-Hope Children’s Centre
within the disposal list as he felt it was an underused and large
building. He asked what the plan for this site would be if the site
was released under the scheme. Councillor Coxshall replied that the
site would be released, although this did not mean it would be sold
on the open market, and could be reinvented as a community site
through public discussion. He agreed that the Council should not
own assets such as pubs and scout huts, and this report outlined
the first stage of the process to ensure transparency.
Councillor Maney supported the recommendations in the report. He
felt that Thurrock had a thriving voluntary and third sector, and
could run buildings such as village halls better than the Council.
He felt it was an important step in the right direction and would
ensure the buildings continued to be important community hubs.
Councillor Huelin echoed Councillor Maney’s comments and
asked if a covenant would be in place when the freehold was
transferred to ensure the building remained for community use.
Councillor Coxshall stated that a covenant would be in place for
the freehold exchanges to ensure they were not used for residential
development. He added that the village hall committees would be
able to sell the properties if they wished once the freehold had
been transferred, but they would have to provide community assets
in an alternative location as outlined in their covenants.
Councillor Abbas supported the recommendations and felt it would be
good for the assets to be fully controlled by the relevant
community groups and forums. He asked how assets such as Purfleet
Children’s Centre would be transferred to community groups.
Councillor Coxshall explained that the sites would be released to a
community group or forum and assessed in line with policy, and
groups could approach the Council if they wanted to take the
building over.
The Leader stated that this was the largest release of sites by the
Council and felt it was an open and transparent process. He agreed
that the Council should not own sites such as pubs or care homes,
and felt it would be better for operators of the care homes to own
their own sites to reduce conflicts of interest. He added that he
had spoken to community groups who were willing to take over the
freeholds of some of the sites so they could access business rate
relief and additional grants. Councillor Coxshall highlighted that
some of the pictures in the appendices were generic photos, for
example the HWRC site and Daiglen Drive, and did not show in detail
the sites being proposed for release.
RESOLVED: That Cabinet:
1. Noted the success of the 3Rs program in generating capital
receipts totalling £9.3m in the financial year 2021/22.
2. Noted the success of the previous review of operational
properties in delivering revenue savings and identifying potential
sites currently being developed by TRL and HRA.
3. Declared the operational properties in section 6.2 of this
report surplus to requirements and receive a report back, where
applicable, on the future of the sites and any alternative delivery
consideration.
4. Declared surplus the properties as shown in Appendix 1, 2, 3,
and 4; and approved the release or re-use of the properties as
outlined.
5. Subject to agreement to release the assets in Appendix 1, 2, 3
and 4, delegated authority of the disposal to the Corporate
Director of Resources and Place Delivery, in consultation with the
Leader and the completion of a delegated authority decision
report.
Reason for decision: as outlined in the
report
This decision is subject to call-in
Supporting documents: