Minutes:
The Senior Consultant introduced the report
and stated that it was formed of three parts: process; concerns;
and next steps. He explained that the HEqIA draft had been received
on 3 August 2020, and Thurrock had responded on 1 October 2020 with
their comments. He explained that HE had responded to
Thurrock’s comments in February 2021, and the team were
currently looking at HE’s response and comparing these to the
HEqIA submitted at the DCO Version 1. He stated that this should be
completed in a few weeks, and the team would then meet with HE to
discuss any concerns. He then described how CIPHAG had held nine
meetings between November 2018 and July 2020, and this was now
being re-started on a more transparent basis, and included all
relevant local authorities and Public Health England. The Senior
Consultant explained that the CIPHAG group were currently deciding
on who would chair the meeting, but stated that HE senior
management would be involved to ensure decisions could be made and
move the meetings forward. He mentioned that there would be 4-5
more CIPHAG meetings, with the first one being at the end of March
to examine outstanding issues. He also explained that the Public
Health Strategic Lead was currently garnering support from other
local authorities for a separate independent audit into the HEqIA
from the DCO Version 1, and this would be an ongoing process over
the next few months. The Senior Consultant explained that Thurrock
currently had concerns regarding elements of the baseline data,
methodology, results, and mitigation; for example air quality data,
access to open spaces, and noise and vibration levels.
Councillor Muldowney questioned the response to the draft HEqIA,
and queried whether HE had responded to Thurrock’s comments
regarding the lack of baseline data. The Senior Consultant
explained that Matt Palmer, the new HE Executive Director, had
agreed that any decisions that required resolution could go through
him directly, which was a step forward. Councillor Muldowney felt
that although it was good to see increased transparency through
CIPHAG, there was still a lack of data and monitoring information.
She thanked the Public Health team for their hard work on this
report, particularly during the pandemic, but questioned whether
the HEqIA had moved on since it was last brought before the Task
Force in October. She also queried whether air pollution could be
mitigated, such as the effects of PM2.5, which the Department of
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs had called the ‘biggest
risk to health’. She stated that Thurrock already had
increased incidence of cardiovascular diseases, COPD, and other
underlying conditions that would be exacerbated during construction
phase and reduce their quality of life and increase likelihood of
premature death. Councillor Muldowney felt pleased to see that the
team were pushing for HE to monitor PM2.5, and felt that HE should
agree to this as part of the governments green agenda. The Senior
Consultant stated that the air quality methodology was included as
part of specific guidance within the Design Manual for Roads and
Bridges (DMRB), as well as further requirements in the National
Policy Statement (NPS). He explained that although the NPS was the
main policy guide for air quality assessment and mitigation, there
was often friction between this document and the DMRB, although
both were not clear on acceptable levels of PM2.5. He explained
that due to staff sickness there were currently no environmental
health officers in Thurrock at present to cover this matter, so
Stantec were working hard on this issue, to try and ensure that HE
monitored PM10, PM2.5 and nitrogen dioxide levels along the route.
The Strategic Lead Public Health added that the summary provided in
the report were comments relating to the working draft, which did
not contain all information required. The version shared recently
for DCO version 1 now includes some of the missing information and
that the team were working hard to review the HEqIA in detail,
including any previously missing information and to understand the
remaining issues.
The TCAG Representative echoed Councillor Muldowney’s thanks
to the Public Health team for their work on the report, and
highlighted that the health impacts of the route would affect all
residents. She urged residents and Councillors to campaign for the
inclusion of the World Health Organisation PM2.5 standards in the
new UK Environmental Bill. She also felt pleased to see that the
new CIPHAG group would be more transparent, and asked if the public
or Task Force Members would be able to view minutes from these
meetings, or if the meeting would be live-streamed. The Senior
Consultant responded that as CIPHAG meetings were technical, they
would not be publicised or live-streamed, but stated that he could
provide regular updates on CIPHAG at Task Force meetings. He
outlined that the transparency of CIPHAG would be of a technical
nature, and would improve information sharing between HE and
Thurrock. The Resident Representative questioned if the new CIPHAG
would be chaired by an independent person, and if this was an
important role. The Senior Consultant responded that the previous
Chair had been Dr Karen Lucas of Leeds University, who had been a
leading authority. He explained that he did not know who the next
chair would be, as this would be decided by HE. He felt that
although an independent chair would be important, if HE were more
transparent and responsive to concerns, it might not be as critical
as with previous CIPHAG meetings.
Councillor Allen highlighted that Thurrock had increased levels of
respiratory illnesses, such as COPD, and stated that increased
levels of air pollution could cause diseases such as heart disease,
lung disease, and strokes. He stated that air pollution accounted
for 40,000 premature deaths across the UK, which equated to 8.3% of
all premature deaths and cost the NHS £40billion per year. He
felt concerned regarding PM2.5 and PM10, as well as particulates
from brake and tyre dust, which could still be harmful and could
come from electric vehicles as well as petrol and diesel
vehicles.
Supporting documents: