Minutes:
The Leader stated that
Councillor Massey would be presenting the report in his role as
Chair of the LTC Task Force.
Councillor Massey introduced the report and stated that this
presented an update on the work of the Task Force since November
2020, and highlighted that the Council remained principally opposed
to the scheme. He explained that since the Development Consent
Order (DCO) had been withdrawn and a new Highways England team had
been appointed, communications had improved and the Council were
receiving greater levels of detail regarding the proposed scheme.
He stated that DCO had been withdrawn due to issues relating to
consultations and although no new consultation had been officially
announced, another one might take place before the next DCO
submission.
Councillor Massey explained that at the December Task Force
meeting, the Committee had focussed on the next steps post-DCO
withdrawal, and had considered the 49 page Planning Inspectorate
letter, which outlined why DCO had been withdrawn, for example the
impact on local road networks, lack of air quality data and lack of
information regarding working hours during construction. He stated
that the Committee had also considered the economic mitigation
list, and had received a verbal update on the A303 project, which
could have an effect on other national road schemes such as the
LTC.
Councillor Massey commented that the Executive Director of Highways
England, Matt Palmer, had attended the January LTC Task Force
meeting, as well as the Highways England Technical Leads, and they
had discussed numerous items of mitigation, such as a bridge over
the Tilbury loop line; 5G connectivity; improved Public Rights of
Way; and the 2 Forts Way path. He added that the Highways England
team had also given a detailed presentation on design aspects of
the scheme, such as viaducts and felt that this presentation was
the best visual that the Committee had seen in terms of detail.
Councillor Massey added that the detail of the March meeting was
not included in this report, due to publication timing, but the
Task Force had spoken about mitigation, such as green spaces around
Chadwell St Mary. Councillor Massey summarised and urged residents
and local businesses to participate in any potential future
consultations, and also make representations to the Planning
Inspectorate, after DCO submission.
Councillor Coxshall thanked Councillor Massey for his report and
questioned the published mitigation list, which included 57 items
of mitigation. He asked whether or not the Task Force felt this was
enough mitigation, or if they would like to see more. Councillor
Massey replied that the Task Force always pushed for additional
mitigation, but felt that due to DCO withdrawal, there was now more
time to have detailed discussions. He stated that the Task Force
would continue to work towards the agreement of the 57 mitigation
areas, as well as any additional mitigation necessary. Councillor
Coxshall stated that it was good to hear the Task Force’s
thoughts. He questioned if the Task Force had considered the route
tolls. He stated that at the Dartford Crossing a reduced toll for
residents had been agreed, rather than £1.5million of funding
directly to the Council, and questioned if this was something the
Task Force wished for the LTC. Councillor Massey replied that the
Task Force had only briefly considered the tolls for the scheme and
monies this could bring to the Council, but this could be added to
the Work Programme.
The Leader summarised and felt it would be good to hear the Task
Force’s thoughts regarding tolls and funding. He also
welcomed the news that Highways England were being more responsive
and communicative, as this meant the Council could now have more
open dialogue with Highways England.
RESOLVED: That Cabinet:
1. Noted the work of the Task
Force.
Reason for decision: as outlined in report.
This decision is subject to call-in.
Councillor Massey left the meeting at 7.34
Supporting documents: