Minutes:
The Chair stated that
Councillor Gledhill would be presenting the report in his role as
Leader of the Council, and thanked him for his attendance at the
meeting.
Councillor Gledhill introduced the item and stated that a
discussion had taken place at the previous Cabinet meeting in
February regarding the proposed Memorandum of Understanding with
Basildon Council, which related to proposed local government
reform. He stated that in between lockdowns in 2020 the government
had proposed local government reform and devolution, which had been
a long-term manifesto commitment, and had decided upon three trial
local authorities in September 2020, which had required full Member
consent. He explained that proposed local authority reorganisation
now only required majority Member consent, and stated that any
potential reorganisation would not take place for the next few
years. Councillor Gledhill then described how Thurrock had become a
unitary authority in 1998, and as a unitary authority had
responsibility for all income and expenditure, including for adult
social care. He stated that the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
would open the conversation between Thurrock and Basildon regarding
any future reorganisation, and would explore the positives and
negatives of any proposed merger. He stated that a merger between
the two local authorities would double the resident population,
which could increase business rate income, but would also increase
expenses for adult social care, as currently Basildon was not
responsible for this area of expenditure, and instead paid a
precept to Essex County Council.
Councillor Gledhill commented that the MOU would look at all
aspects of any proposed merger, including potential costs and
impact on services for residents and businesses. He felt that there
were currently a lot of unknowns regarding any potential merger,
and more information was needed which would be sought through the
signing of the MOU. He felt that a merger of the two local
authorities could be a positive endeavour, but highlighted that
both councils wanted as much information as possible. He explained
that any proposed merger would not begin now, but felt that central
government were pushing for local government reform, and Thurrock
needed to be moving forwards.
The Chair thanked Councillor Gledhill for this presentation and
report, and questioned the broader context for a merger. He asked
whether the current local government operating processes would not
be viable in future. Councillor Gledhill replied and stated that in
2020 central government had felt that unitary authorities should
have a resident population of 300-500,000, and Thurrock would be
able to reach this figure if a merger took place with Basildon
Council. He highlighted that he could not speak for central
government, but felt that there was currently no rush for local
authority mergers or any central government commitment to scrap
current local government organisation. The Chair asked if local
government reorganisation would be a medium term goal for central
government, and questioned what would happen if the Council did not
act immediately. Councillor Gledhill responded and stated that
Thurrock wanted to be on the front foot for any government reform,
and wanted to be in a strong position which had been carefully
evaluated, in case central government began to push local
government reform in future. Councillor Gledhill stated that the
MOU would mean that Thurrock and Basildon could officially consider
the possibility of mergers, but did not mean that Thurrock could
not look at other options for reform. He added that if the MOU
found that there would be no benefit merging Thurrock and Basildon
then the process could be stopped.
The Chair then questioned how residents would be engaged in the
process, and if they would be able to have their say regarding any
mergers. Councillor Gledhill stated that although he could not
pre-empt central government policies, Thurrock residents would be
able to have their say if the Council decided to merge. He
explained that the Council needed to consider all costs and
benefits, as well as looking at all proposals in a greater level of
detail, before asking residents for their opinion, and stated that
the MOU would promote openness and transparency throughout the
process. The Chair asked what the next steps in the process would
be. Councillor Gledhill replied and explained that there was
currently not a high enough level of detail to be able to outline
any detailed next steps. He felt that all costs and benefits needed
to be worked through before any decisions were made, but explained
that Thurrock wanted to ensure it was the right size and decisions
were still made locally and had a local impact. He stated that
there needed to be more discussion between Thurrock and Basildon,
but the MOU would outline these discussions and could be used as a
national template.
Councillor Duffin thanked Councillor Gledhill for his report and
felt that the Council needed to understand all positives and
negatives of the proposed merger, and needed as much information as
possible. He felt that central government were proposing lots of
changes in the next ten years, and Thurrock wanted to be at the
forefront of this change. He added that a proposed merger could be
a good future opportunity, but highlighted the need to consider all
options, as well as what it could look like if Thurrock maintained
the status quo. Councillor Ralph agreed that a potential merger
could be a good opportunity, but wanted to ensure that residents in
the west of the borough would continue to be considered in all
decisions. Councillor Ralph also sought assurance that Thurrock
would not become the housebuilding area of the new authority, as he
felt that other Councils could use Thurrock to meet housebuilding
targets, particularly with the news of the successful Freeport bid
and the growth this would bring. Councillor Gledhill responded and
stated that approximately 30,000 new houses needed to be built
within Thurrock, and he understood resident’s concerns about
new houses being built within their local communities. He stated
that if Thurrock and Basildon merged, there would still be a
planning regime, as well as a Local Plan, which would ensure
Thurrock did not bear the brunt of housebuilding requirements. He
stated that the new Freeport would improve infrastructure, the
local economy, and the lives of local residents, and felt that a
larger unitary authority could maximise this benefit across the
south Essex region.
Councillor Rice stated that as Thurrock continued to build houses,
the population was predicted to rise from 170,000 to 300,000, which
would bring it into line with government’s proposed
guidelines for the size of a local authority. He felt that Thurrock
had experienced lots of growth, including through the Local Plan
and housebuilding, and asked if this would be enough so that
Thurrock could remain a separate unitary authority. Councillor
Gledhill responded that the MOU would look at future aspirations
across both boroughs, and would work to understand both Local Plans
and local development schemes, including the impact this could have
on housebuilding and local population levels. He agreed that
Thurrock had experienced lots of growth, and explained that the MOU
could find a merger would not be beneficial and would therefore
look at other options. He felt that a merger between Thurrock and
Basildon could be a good opportunity as Basildon currently had lots
of industry and infrastructure, including the largest tractor plant
in Europe, and Thurrock could benefit from this too.
The Chair summarised and thanked Councillor Gledhill for his
attendance and presentation.
RESOLVED: That the Committee:
1. Commented on the report and the proposal for consideration by
Cabinet at their meeting on 10 March 2021.
Councillor Gledhill left the meeting at
7.59pm
Supporting documents: