Venue: Training Room, The Beehive, West Street, Grays, RM17 6XP
Contact: Lucy Tricker, Senior Democratic Services Officer
Email: direct.democracy@thurrock.gov.uk
Items
No. |
Item |
22. |
Minutes PDF 352 KB
To approve as a correct record the minutes of
the Lower Thames Crossing Task Force meeting held on 16 August
2021.
Minutes:
The minutes from Lower Thames Crossing Task
Force meeting held on 16 August 2021 were approved as a true and
correct record.
|
23. |
Items of Urgent Business
To receive additional items that the Chair is
of the opinion should be considered as a matter of urgency, in
accordance with Section 100B (4) (b) of the Local Government Act
1972.
Minutes:
There were no items of urgent business.
|
24. |
Declaration of Interests
Minutes:
There were no interests declared.
|
25. |
Thurrock Council Consultation Response (to follow) PDF 379 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Interim Assistant Director Regeneration
and Place Delivery introduced the report and stated that the
National Highways (NH) consultation ended on 8 September 2021, but
Thurrock Council and other local authorities had received an
extended deadline of 6 October 2021 to submit responses, due to
internal governance processes. He asked that the Task Force
identify opportunities and potential amendments to the draft
consultation response before it went to Full Council for agreement
and final submission.
The Senior Consultant stated that the consultation response
included a 17 page short summary, a 100 page overall summary, and
approximately 500 pages of technical appendices. He stated that
this was an average length for a consultation response, and the
extension given to submit the response was due to governance
processes within local authorities. He explained that the
consultation response was split into seven sections, the first of
these being the adequacy of consultation and policy. He explained
that this document was approximately ten pages long and outlined
how meaningful the consultation had been, and if it had complied
with both National and National Highways (NH) policies.
The Senior Consultant outlined section two of the consultation
response which discussed traffic modelling and alternative
transport issues. He felt that this area presented issues for
Thurrock Council as the documents did not meet the necessary
objectives, and did not sufficiently identify alternatives. He
described how the third section of the response considered the
local impacts and benefits. He explained that Thurrock had
determined the proposed route would negatively impact local
connectivity, reduce the ability for housing development in the
area, and have a large impact on the local road network. He
mentioned that there was not enough detailed mitigation included in
the consultation for the proposed increase in traffic that would be
seen both during the construction phase and at route opening. The
Senior Consultant moved on and explained section four of the
consultation response which analysed construction impacts and
proposed mitigation. He stated that the response focussed on the
future, which included changes in travel patterns and the effect of
the government’s decarbonisation plan. He stated that the
current route proposal did not recognise the government’s
move towards decarbonisation, and did not include sufficient
provision for cycling and public rights of way routes. He added
that NH had not yet made a legal commitment to provide skills
training and employment for local people as part of the
construction phase, and also did not address how local companies
could become part of the procurement process.
The Senior Consultant explained section six of the response which
focussed on technical and process matters, such as Development
Consent Order (DCO) requirements. He explained that all of the DCO
requirements, except for the travellers site detailed design, had
to be approved by the Secretary of State under current proposals,
but officers were pushing for this to be amended, so approval could
be granted by Thurrock Council. He added that some of the utilities
realignment works would be Nationally Significant Infrastructure
projects ...
view the full minutes text for item 25.
|
26. |
Work Programme PDF 26 KB
Minutes:
Councillor Muldowney requested an item on
compensation be brought before the Task Force, including statutory
blight and non-statutory compensation, such as hypothecation for
people with health issues. The Chair thanked the Task Force for
their input, and the Senior Democratic Services Officer for finding
an alternative location at short notice.
|