Minutes:
The Leader introduced the
report and stated that he would make an ongoing commitment to
listen to all parties involved with the Thameside. He explained
that £1.2m funding had been allocated from the capital
programme for the relocation of the Central Library, and the team
were working hard to achieve Accredited Status for the museum. He
thanked the Corporate Overview and Scrutiny Committee for their
comments and proposed recommendation amendments, which had been
circulated to Cabinet Members and members of the public, and stated
that recommendation 3 contained an error which would be amended
from “consultation on alternative options for the
delivery” to “consultation on all options for the
delivery”.
Councillor Arnold felt pleased to see consultation would be
undertaken on the relocation of services and sought assurances that
there would be enough money to relocate the museum. The Leader
confirmed that money had been allocated for the relocation of the
museum, and highlighted that concerns had been raised regarding the
archiving work regularly undertaken by museum staff and volunteers.
He explained that the team would be working to improve and protect
the heritage of the borough currently stored in archives.
Councillor Spillman echoed Councillor Arnold’s comments and
felt pleased to see consultation would be undertaken, whilst
discussions continued with TLS/TICC. Councillor Snell thanked the
Corporate Overview and Scrutiny Committee for their discussions and
suggested amendments, many of which had been taken on board by
Cabinet. He stated that any updates on the Thameside would be
referred to the Committee before coming to Cabinet. Councillor
Maney questioned if the £18-20m of future investment to bring
the Thameside Complex back up to standard was accurate. The Leader
explained that the £18-20m investment figure had been
estimated over a 30-year period, but the Council would endeavour to
be open and transparent by outlining how this figure was
determined. He stated that he had conversed with the Director of
Place regarding this figure, and he would work to ensure it formed
part of the consultation. Councillor Arnold sought assurances that
the Council would continue to consider all options available for
the Thameside. The Leader stated that all options would be
considered, including ongoing discussions with the TLS/TICC
bidders.
RESOLVED: That Cabinet:
1. Noted the bids from Thurrock Lifestyle Solutions/Thurrock
International Celebration of Culture and Waltham International
College and thanked them for their efforts to try and find a
financially sustainable alternative for the future of the
building.
2. Noted the significant concerns regarding both proposals and that
neither is recommended, in its current form, as a financially
sustainable alternative for the future of building. Cabinet agrees
that negotiations and discussions will continue with TLS/TICC to
try and facilitate a financially sustainable bid.
3. Authorised the Director of Place to undertake consultation on
all options for the delivery of cultural activities and events in
Grays and the wider borough. A report on this recommendation to be
brought back to the Corporate Overview and Scrutiny Committee and
Cabinet on completion of the consultation.
4. Authorised the Corporate Director of Adults, Housing and Health
to undertake consultation on the relocation of the library from the
Thameside Building to the Civic Offices. A report on this
recommendation to be brought back to the Corporate Overview and
Scrutiny Committee and Cabinet on completion of the
consultation.
5. Authorised the Director of Place to undertake consultation on
the relocation of the museum from the Thameside Building to the
Civic Offices with a view to achieving Accredited Museum status. A
report on this recommendation to be brought back to the Corporate
Overview and Scrutiny Committee and Cabinet on completion of the
consultation.
6. Noted the allocation of £1.2million in the Capital
Programme agreed at Council on 1st March 2023, funded from asset
sales, for the relocation of the library and museum.
Reason for decision: as outlined in the
report
This decision is subject to call-in
Supporting documents: